030 Postoperative Penile Prosthesis Pain: Is it Worse in Diabetic Patients?
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is an effective, safe and satisfactory treatment option for medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. Postoperative complications include infection, mechanical failure, erosion, and pain1. Current literature suggests the need for a better approach to postoperative pain management after IPP surgery2. Furthermore, targeted pain management strategies for diabetic patients have been suggested in the non-urologic literature, as several clinical studies have demonstrated that postoperative pain is different in diabetic and non-diabetic patients3. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in postoperative pain after IPP placement in diabetics. This is a single-institution retrospective review of 173 primary penoscrotal three-piece IPP prosthesis cases performed between 2014 and 2017. The main outcome measure was the number of 30-day postoperative emergency room and unplanned clinic visits specifically for significant pain. T-test was used for mean assessment and chi-square analysis was used for proportion assessment. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The top HgbA1C quartile (with values greater than or equal to 8) was compared to the other HgbA1C quartiles, for a total of 30 (23%) and 98 (77%) patients, respectively.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- 030 Postoperative Penile Prosthesis Pain: Is it Worse in Diabetic Patients?
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2019
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.