Purification of Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufactured Niobium for Superconducting RF-Applications Transactions on Applied Superconductivity

Le résumé fourni par la source

Superconducting radio frequency (SRF)-cavities in the field of particle accelerators are mostly manufactured from bulk or sheet niobium (Nb). Complex shapes of SRF-components like high order mode-couplers or cavities working at high fields are high in cost and lead-time. The fabrication of these parts via additive manufacturing promises a more effective production and higher flexibility in geometries. At CERN, additive manufacturing with pure Nb by selective laser melting (SLM) is under development for future particle accelerator components. In comparison with conventionally produced Nb SRF-components, made of highly pure Nb, the SLM-manufactured Nb material contains considerable impurities due to raw material processing and the SLM-process conditions itself. Contaminations with light elements, such as oxygen and nitrogen, introduced into the material's structure by the powder and the SLM process, contribute to an important lowering of the residual resistance ratio (RRR). In order to increase the RRR-values for conventionally manufactured SRF-cavities, titanium (Ti) gettering-heat treatments were investigated since the 1980s. This paper introduces the first representative Nb-material realized at CERN by additive manufacturing by SLM and the current studies on the post-treatment of sample material by vacuum firing and Ti-gettering-heat treatments. The samples are analyzed by mass spectroscopy and RRR-measurements in correlation with different process parameters. First trials with Ti-gettering heat treatments demonstrate an increase in the RRR from 7 to above 100, whereas the oxygen content could be reduced from 600 to 17 ppm. These results show that a purification post-treatment of SLM-manufactured Nb-components is feasible and pave the way for functioning SRF-components made by additive manufacturing.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.