The Effect of Lidocaine Gel on Pain Perception During Diagnostic Flexible Cystoscopy in Women: A Randomized Control Trial

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if there is a clinically meaningful variation in pain perception when using lidocaine gel versus plain lubricant prior to office-based diagnostic flexible cystoscopy. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial comparing lidocaine gel and water-based lubricant for the performance of diagnostic flexible cystoscopy. Women undergoing cystoscopy were randomized to either transurethral 2% lidocaine (Uro-Jet) or water-based lubricant prior to cystoscopy. Participants and physicians were blinded, and pain was assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). A priori sample size calculation indicated the need for 40 patients per group to achieve 90% power. Descriptive statistics and Student t test were utilized. RESULTS: The study included 116 patients, 61 in the lidocaine group and 55 in the plain lubricant group. Numeric rating scale in the lidocaine group (2.43 [SD, 1.95]) was significantly lower than that in the plain lubricant group (3.58 [SD, 2.73]) (P = 0.01). After controlling for age and ethnicity, separately as well as together, the procedural NRS scores were 1.37 points (P = 0.002), 0.97 points (P = 0.04), and 1.22 points (P = 0.01) lower in those receiving lidocaine. After the procedure, fewer patients in the lidocaine group (2/61 = 3.3%) requested pain medicine when compared with the plain lubricant group (11/55 = 20%) (P = 0.01). Although anticipated pain scored similarly between groups, actual pain compared with anticipated pain was significantly lower in the lidocaine group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pain perception during flexible cystoscopy decreased when using 2% transurethral lidocaine gel. The use of 2% lidocaine gel is suggested for the reduction of pain at the time of diagnostic flexible cystoscopy in women.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.