Distorted sound perception and subjective benefit after stapedotomy – a prospective single-centre study
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of perceived sound after stapedotomy over a 1-year follow-up period focussing on incidence of dysacusis, particularly distorted sound perception (DSP). DSP was assessed by (i) determination of the frequencies and hearing level that such perceptions are elicited by pure tones (pure-tone-evoked distorted sound perception, PTE-DSP), a novel psychoacoustic measurement introduced in this paper, and (ii) assessment of patient-reported occurrence of DSP using the Amsterdam Post Operative Sound Evaluation (APOSE) questionnaire (APOSE-DSP). DESIGN: Prospective study. STUDY SAMPLE: Patients (n = 23) with otosclerosis undergoing stapedotomy. RESULTS: An air-bone gap of <20 dB was achieved in 100% of the patients. Three weeks postoperatively, 48% of the patients reported measured PTE-DSP and 39% of the patients experienced APOSE-DSP. The PTE-DSP significantly decreased during the 1-year follow-up period (p = 0.03). Postoperatively, APOSE-DSP was associated with a smaller benefit (improvement in air conduction; p = 0.03), yet, a lower bone conduction pure-tone average was associated with PTE-DSP (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: DSP after stapedotomy is associated with a smaller benefit 3 months after stapedotomy. DSP commonly occur after stapedotomy, but decrease over time. This is important information to be included in patient counselling before stapedotomy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Distorted sound perception and subjective benefit after stapedotomy – a prospective single-centre study
- Date Crossref
- 27/01/2019
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.