Trauma rehabilitation in a teaching hospital in Antananarivo, Madagascar: current provision and patients’ perspectives

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: This study aims to describe the current provision of trauma rehabilitation in Antananarivo, Madagascar and explore the experiences and perspectives of users of this service in order to inform future research and service development.Material and methods: A qualitative study supplemented by a descriptive service review were applied in the central government hospital in Antananarivo. Registers in the rehabilitation department were analyzed for a 3 month period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of users of the rehabilitation service and were subject to thematic analysis.Results: One in six patients treated in the rehabilitation department has survived a traumatic injury, with limb injuries comprising the majority. Analysis of interviews with 10 adult patients, following traumatic injuries to the lower limbs (6), upper limbs (3) or polytrauma (1) generated seven broad themes: health seeking behavior, organization of services, clinical management, costs and financial impact, effect on function and role, psychological impact and societal attitudes.Conclusions: Financial constraints and impact on personal finances pervade the overall picture. The perspectives and experiences elucidated will inform future research into the development of context-specific models of care for people with trauma-related disabilities in Madagascar.Implications for rehabilitationPotentially treatable traumatic injury can have a profound effect on function and societal participation in Madagascar.Interventions to increase access to timely acute trauma care and rehabilitation are needed, and may include different models of financing and innovations to reduce materials costs and length of stay.A structured rehabilitation pathway must be integrated to the earliest stages of trauma care, including scrutinizing the use of prolonged immobilization.Consideration should be given to models of care which are financially and geographically accessible to the population.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.