Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2018 article

Hospital policy following cancelled orthopaedic surgery and the patient experience—making the best of a bad situation

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Number of cancelled elective orthopaedic surgeries has increased over the last decade as strains on surgical services exacerbates. Being told an operation is cancelled is disappointing for the patient, the clinician and is not without a financial loss. This experience is frustrating for patients who are often not informed of cancellations by doctors and sent home dissatisfied without clarity of treatment plans. Alternatives have to be sought to safeguard the patient experience, maintain communication and avoid wastage of resources. Methods: Over a 1-year period, 117 patients were prospectively shortlisted with a cancellation on the day of surgery in a dedicated elective orthopaedic unit. Questionnaire data assessed adherence to Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Theatre Efficiency guidance, including: healthcare professional informing patients; time offered for explanation; patient understanding and satisfaction as well as perception of being kept nil by mouth (NBM) longer than necessary. Opinions of alternative satisfactory professionals to lead cancellation discussion was also evaluated. Results: 35.04% of cancellations were informed by consultants, 23.77% by junior doctors and 38.46% by nurses. Out of 10, patient understanding was 8.31 and satisfaction 6.37 for consultant led discussions against 5.12 and 4.07 for nurses, respectively. Overall, 35.04% of patients felt they were kept NBM longer than necessary vs. 60% of the 45 patients told by nurses. 90.60% felt consultants were the ideal professional to lead cancellation discussions however 70.94% stated a registrar would be satisfactory. Conclusions: Cancelled elective surgery that a patient has mentally prepared for is extremely demoralising. Poor peri-operative communication and management further worsens the patient experience and represents sub-standard care. It is paramount that guidelines exist where patients are informed of reasons for cancellation by a senior surgeon in a manner that accounts for availability of resources.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Hospital policy following cancelled orthopaedic surgery and the patient experience—making the best of a bad situation
Date Crossref
01/11/2018
Éditeur
AME Publishing Company
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.