Aller au contenu principal
2018 conference-abstract

Abstract WP23: Off-Hour Presentation and Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion After Endovascular Therapy: a Matched Case-Control Study

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Patients who are admitted during off-hours (nights and weekends) are thought to have worse outcomes. This might be explained by delayed times to treatment. We sought to determine the effect of off-hour presentation on processes of care and outcomes at a comprehensive stroke center. Methods: We reviewed our prospectively collected endovascular database at a tertiary care academic institution between Sep 2010-Dec 2016. All patients that underwent endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke were included and categorized into two groups: those arriving during regular hours (weekday 7AM-7PM) or off-hours. The 2 groups were then matched for age, baseline NIHSS and glucose levels using a weighted Euclidian distance method. Baseline, procedural, and radiological characteristics, as well as outcome parameters were compared. Results: 926 (463 pairs) patients were included. Patients presenting off-hours had higher rates of hypertension (78.2% vs 66.7%, p<0.01) and longer median time from last-known normal to picture (273 minutes [167-421] vs 253[145-472], p=0.04). Other baseline characteristics including comorbidities, NIHSS, ASPECT scores, occlusion site were well balanced. There was no difference between groups in picture to puncture median time (57 minutes [38-95] vs 52[36-78], p=0.11) and utilization of CT angiography (p=0.56) or CT perfusion (p=0.82) imaging or IV t-PA use (p= 0.37). Moreover there were no differences between groups in terms of rates of successful reperfusion (mTici 2b-3) (p=0.26), parenchymal hematomas (p=0.12), 90-day good outcomes (mRS 0-2) (p=0.99) or mortality (p=0.52). In multivariate analysis, off-hour presentation was not associated with 90-day good outcome. Conclusions: Our study shows that patients presenting off-hours have similar picture to puncture times and clinical outcomes as those presenting during regular hours.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract WP23: Off-Hour Presentation and Outcomes in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion After Endovascular Therapy: a Matched Case-Control Study
Date Crossref
22/01/2018
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryHospital Admissions and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.