Rapid Detection and Monitoring of Flavobacterium psychrophilum in Water by Using a Handheld, Field-Portable Quantitative PCR System
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Advances in technology are making it easier for rapid field detection of microbes in aquaculture. Specifically, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis, which has traditionally been confined to laboratory-based protocols, is now available in a handheld, field-portable system. The feasibility of using the Biomeme handheld qPCR system for rapid (<50 min) on-site detection and monitoring of Flavobacterium psychrophilum from filtered water samples was evaluated. Paired water samples were collected over a 23-d period from microcosm tanks that housed fish injected with known levels of F. psychrophilum. Water samples were filtered through 0.45-μm nitrocellulose filters and were analyzed with both the Biomeme qPCR platform and a traditional bench qPCR protocol. The two methods identified similar fluctuations in F. psychrophilum DNA throughout the study. Standard curves relating quantification cycles to the number of F. psychrophilum colony-forming units (CFU) were constructed and analyzed; results indicated that CFU increased rapidly between days 6 and 8 of the trial and then progressively decreased during the remaining 15 d. Average calculated log10(CFU/mL) values were significantly correlated between the two platforms. Rapid, field-based qPCR can be incorporated into daily water quality monitoring protocols to help detect and monitor microbes in aquaculture systems.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Rapid Detection and Monitoring of <i>Flavobacterium psychrophilum</i> in Water by Using a Handheld, Field-Portable Quantitative PCR System
- Date Crossref
- 22/11/2018
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Smith-Root (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
University of Idaho Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences and Aquaculture Research Institute pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Inc. Smith-Root pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Bronson Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Biomeme pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Syndel pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Smith-Root (United States), Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services et Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences and Aquaculture Research Institute — University of Idaho, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.