Introducing a vascular Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) – The patient perspective
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
however clinical assessment remains the gold-standard test for initial maturity.We aimed to assess whether radiological assessment was delaying cannulation in patients with clinically maturing fistulas.Methods: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of all established haemodialysis patients, who underwent AVF formation between January 2015-August 2017.Electronic records were interrogated for time to first cannulation, clinical evidence of maturity at 6 weeks and radiological followup.A Mann-Whitney U Test was employed for statistical significance.Results: 76 patients underwent AVF formation (male¼51) with brachiocephalic being the most common procedure performed (RCF¼19, BCF¼39, BBF¼17, other¼1).61 (80.3%) of fistula were clinically maturing at 6 weeks.The overall median time to first cannulation and follow-up ultrasound was 64 days (IQR¼53-93) and 72 days (52-137) respectively.19 (31.1%) patients with clinically maturing fistulae had cannulation delayed until radiological results.Median time to cannulation in this group was 77 days (64-125), compared with 64 days (49-82) in patients were cannulation was based on clinical findings alone (p¼0.02).Conclusion: Radiological assessment is a useful adjunct to care but is associated with delay in cannulation if not used in conjunction with clinical assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Introducing a vascular Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) – The patient perspective
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2018
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.