BPOS Oral Presentations
Rattachement africain : gb, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Many families of children diagnosed with cancer are faced with difficult treatment decisions.They may be at risk of experiencing significant distress over their decisions.Aims: We aimed to explore parents' treatment decision-making process, as well as any information needs and preferences.Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with parents whose child had been diagnosed with cancer in the past 12 months.Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.The study is ongoing; anticipated study close is December 17 (aim = 25 parents).Results: To date, 17 parents (mean age of child at diagnosis = 7.4 y) have completed the interview (response rate = 35%).Early findings suggest parents find making treatment decisions "overwhelming" and "stressful."While most parents report a preference for shared decision-making with the child's clinician, they often feel as though they have no choice because of perceived lack of options or a lack of knowledge.Parents tend not to include their child in major decisions, however acknowledge the importance for children to be involved in day-to-day decisions.Many parents experience information overload, but also report a lack of understanding of information.Many parents also sought information online.Barriers to quality decision-making include feeling distressed and overwhelmed with information.Facilitators included a good relationship with their clinician and use of simple language.Conclusions: Families require clearer information provided in multiple modalities, more guidance to engage in shared decision-making, and more emotional support throughout the decision process.These findings have contributed to the development of Delta-an online decision-aid supporting families deciding whether to enrol in a paediatric oncology clinical trial.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- BPOS Oral Presentations
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2018
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.