Impact of Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Drainage on Postoperative Outcome after Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Rattachement africain : us, Égypte. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The value of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on the surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a point of controversy.The aim of this study was to identify the impact of biliary drainage (BD) prior to PD on the postoperative outcome.Methods: The data of patients, who underwent PD from February 2009 to February 2017, were retrospectively studied.A comparison was performed between 2 groups of patients; group A (with PBD) and group B (without PBD), according to preoperative, operative and postoperative data.Results: PD was performed in 158 patients with periampullary lesions.Group A, included 76 patients (48.1%) while 82 patients were included in group B (51.9%).The incidence of major postoperative complications was significantly higher in group A (P=0.04).The infectious complications were higher in group like; positive intraoperative bile culture (P=0.06), intraabdominal abscess (P=0.07) and wound infection (P=0.04).Also, hospital stay and mortality were higher in group A (P=0.05 and 0.08, respectively).High preoperative bilirubin level was not a risk factor for major postoperative complications (P=0.12).Conclusion: Patients with PBD had a significantly higher incidence of major postoperative complications mainly of infectious ones, thus PBD should be performed only in selected patients, not as a routine prior PD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Drainage on Postoperative Outcome after Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2018
- Éditeur
- Celsius Publishing House
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.