BNNT/Fe3O4 System as an Efficient Tool for Magnetohyperthermia Therapy
Le résumé fourni par la source
Nanostructured materials have been widely studied aiming to biomedical applications, primarily for the purpose of carrying drugs or molecules of interest in a selected tissue or organ. In this context, boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs), when functionalized with specific moieties, could be useful as nanovectors for delivery of proteins, drugs, and also RNAi molecules, due to their capacity to be uptaked by cells. The introduction of magnetic nanoparticles allows the use of such system as a hyperthermia agent. Thus, once it has been targeted to tumor areas, it could kill cancer cells by magnetohyperthermia therapy. In order to study this effect, magnetite nanoparticles were incorporated into hydroxilated BNNT. The system was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). The results obtained show that magnetite nanoparticles are linked to the nanotubes. Magnetic measurements show that coercivity and magnetization were not disturbed after incorporation to the BNNT. Based on this, a new methodology for in vitro magnetohyperthermia experiments was developed, aiming to treat each cell group individually preserving its sterility. The biological assays of the system demonstrate its good cell viability and the great potential of this nanomaterial as a magnetohyperthermia agent for cancer treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- BNNT/Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> System as an Efficient Tool for Magnetohyperthermia Therapy
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2018
- Éditeur
- American Scientific Publishers
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.