Supracostal PCNL-Standard Nephrostomy with Day Long Pain Versus Painless Tubeless
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To determine the scope of tubeless (TL) supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in terms of safety through a randomized controlled trial.Materials and Methods: Adult patients (>14 years) undergoing supracostal PCNL were randomized into two groups (25 patients each), by randomizing odd number for supracostal PCNL with tube (WT) as group A and for TL supracostal PCNL as group B. Both groups received injectable analgesia on operative day and oral analgesia from the first post-operative day.Pain severity was objectively assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS).Chest X-ray and kidney ultrasonography were done to detect any pleural effusion and perinephric collection.These complications along with thoracostomy and endotracheal intubation were compared between the groups.Results: The mean (VAS) score in group A and B was 7.88±0.83and 4.12±0.83,respectively (p=0.01).Four of 25 (16%) patients in group A and 1 of 25 (4%) patients in group B developed pleural effusion.Two patients (8%) in group A and 1 patient (4%) in group B required tube thoracostomy (p=0.56).One patient (4%) in group A and 2 patients (8%) in group B developed perinephric collection (p=0.56).A single patient in each group (2%) developed respiratory distress needing elective intubation and ventilation (p=1.00).The mean hospital stay in group B (4.12±0.52 days) was shorter than in group A (4.68±0.85days) (p=0.01).Conclusion: Tubeless supracostal PCNL is less painful than supracostal PCNL WT, without difference in complication rates.Supracostal PCNL (TL) has a shorter hospital stay.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Supracostal PCNL-Standard Nephrostomy with Day Long Pain Versus Painless Tubeless
- Date Crossref
- 13/06/2018
- Éditeur
- Galenos Yayinevi
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.