Aller au contenu principal
2018 article

Interbirth Interval and Pregnancy Complications and Outcomes: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

16Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Although the definition of a short interbirth interval has been inconsistent in the literature, Healthy People 2020 recommends that women wait at least 18 months after a live birth before attempting their next pregnancy. In the United States, approximately 33% of pregnancies are conceived within 18 months of a previous birth. Pregnancies that result from short interbirth intervals can pose serious risks. The objective of this study was to determine the association between interbirth interval and understudied pregnancy complications and outcomes, including small for gestational age (SGA) infants, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), preterm PROM (PPROM), placenta previa, and gestational diabetes, using Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System data from Mississippi and Tennessee. METHODS: This study collected self-reported information from 2212 women on interbirth interval (≤18 months, ie, short; 19-35 months, ie, intermediate; and ≥36 months, ie, long; referent), PPROM, placenta previa, and gestational diabetes. SGA and PROM data were obtained from birth certificates. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: After adjustment, there were no strong associations between interbirth interval and PPROM, gestational diabetes, or SGA infants. However, women with shorter intervals had increased odds of PROM (short: OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.22-10.23 and intermediate: OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.28-13.03) and placenta previa (short: OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.10-6.05 and intermediate: OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.94-3.05). DISCUSSION: The study's findings provide further support for encouraging women to space their pregnancies appropriately. Moreover, findings underscore the need to provide women with family planning services so that closely spaced pregnancies and unintended pregnancies can be avoided. Additional studies of the role of interbirth interval on these understudied pregnancy complications and outcomes are warranted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Interbirth Interval and Pregnancy Complications and Outcomes: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System
Date Crossref
25/05/2018
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsGlobal Maternal and Child HealthReproductive Health and Contraception

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.