Perception of aesthetics and personality traits in orthognathic surgery patients: A comparison of still and moving images
Rattachement africain : at. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
It is common in practicing orthognathic surgery to evaluate faces with retruded or protruded chins (dysgnathic faces) using photographs. Because motion may alter how the face is perceived, we investigated the perception of faces presented via photographs and videos. Two hundred naïve raters (lay persons, without maxillo facial surgery background) evaluated 12 subjects with varying chin anatomy [so-called skeletal Class I (normal chin), Class II (retruded chin), and Class III (protruded chin)]. Starting from eight traits, with Factor analysis we found a two-Factor solution, i.e. an "aesthetics associated traits cluster" and a Factor "personality traits cluster" which appeared to be uncorrelated. Internal consistency of the Factors found for photographs and videos was excellent. Generally, female raters delivered better ratings than males, but the effect sizes were small. We analyzed differences and the respective effect magnitude between photograph and video perception. For each skeletal class the aesthetics associated dimensions were rated similarly between photographs and video clips. In contrast, specific personality traits were rated differently. Differences in the class-specific personality traits seen on photographs were "smoothed" in the assessment of videos, which implies that photos enhance stereotypes commonly attributed to a retruded or protruded chin.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Perception of aesthetics and personality traits in orthognathic surgery patients: A comparison of still and moving images
- Date Crossref
- 18/05/2018
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Vienna pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University Clinic for Cranio- pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Psychology Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University of Vienna, University Clinic for Cranio- et Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods — Faculty of Psychology.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.