Laparoskopik Sleeve Gastrektomi De Pulmoner Tromboemboli Riskinin Padua Skoru ile Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Pulmonary thromboembolism in bariatric surgery is a complication that has higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality, requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. As morbid obesity rates increase in society, the development potential of pulmonary thromboemboli further increases. The aim of our study was to evalute clinical, laboratory and radiological outcomes of patients who have been diagnosed with pulmonary tromboembolism and treated retrospectively.Material and methods: The clinical follow up cards were collected of patients who had undergone Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity between March 2014 to January 2016 retrospectively. Clinical, radiological, laboratory, demographic characteristics outcomes and Padua scores were evaluated. Postoperative data and complications of the patients were evaluated statistically. Factors that might affect postoperative pulmonary thromboembolism were evaluated by univariate regression analysis.Results: The gender of patients were 146 55% female and 124 45% male. The mean age was 44.7 ± 4.3 years. Also mean postoperative stay in hospital was 5.7 ± 2.3 days. Patients performed varicose vein socks in mid-high-risk MR and low-risk LR groups while the pneumothic device was applied to very high-risk VHR and high-risk groups. Despite the protective procedures, deep vein thrombosis was seen in 3 patients and pulmonary thromboembolism was seen in 2 patients p
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Laparoskopik Sleeve Gastrektomi De Pulmoner Tromboemboli Riskinin Padua Skoru ile Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma
- Date Crossref
- 28/01/2019
- Éditeur
- Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.