Approaches to quantitating the results of differentially dyed cottons
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The differential dyeing (DD) method has been a subjective method for visually determining immature cotton fibers. We attempted to quantitate DD results and offer an efficient means of elucidating cotton maturity, without visual discretion. Image analysis of cotton color obtained with a scanner was performed and compared to spectrophotometrically measured color. Low, Medium and High micronaire (Mic) cotton standards were dyed, and we determined that blending the cotton yielded more precise color measurement; with the mean red, green and blue (RGB) values for a low Mic sample being: 101.6 ± 23.9, 83.1 ± 22.0 and 98.3 ± 23.1, respectively; while blending yielded RGB values: 121.6 ± 9.0, 98.8 ± 8.6 and 116.0 ± 8.9, respectively. Comparing RGB values to Mic, it was found that R and B color parameters do not show a trend, but G values decrease with increasing Mic indicating a decrease in G dye uptake with an increase in maturity. The conventional L*a*b* color space values were also obtained for the dyed cottons and compared to RGB and Mic results. The %CV for a* values are higher compared to L* and b* measurements: ∼31.9%, 18.9% and 8.6% for low, medium and high Mic samples, respectively. L* and b* decrease while a* increases with Mic, indicating an increase in R dye with an increase in maturity. The DD Bath method was found to be reliable, with R showing the greatest variances. G and a* values obtained were found to be the best correlation of differences in Mic.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Approaches to quantitating the results of differentially dyed cottons
- Date Crossref
- 20/04/2018
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Cotton (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Agricultural Research Service pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
USDA pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Fiber Physics pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Cotton (United States), Agricultural Research Service et USDA, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.