Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2018 article

Candida İzolatlarının Antifungal Duyarlılığının Belirlenmesinde Klinik Laboratuvar Standartları Enstitüsü (CLSI) ve Avrupa Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılık Testleri Komitesi (EUCAST) Sıvı Mikrodilüsyon Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

21Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Candida species are among the top 10 pathogens causing bloodstream infections associated with high morbidity, mortality. In spite of the development of new antifungal drugs, epidemiological studies have shown that resistance to antifungal drugs among Candida isolates is becoming a serious problem. The aim of this study was to compare the antifungal broth microdilution methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and anidulafungin susceptibility of Candida blood isolates. The study consisted of 74 Candida albicans, 67 Candida parapsilosis, 30 Candida glabrata, and 18 Candida tropicalis isolates. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined after 24 and 48 hour of incubation with CLSI method and only 24 hour of incubation with EUCAST method except anidulofungin. The MIC values obtained by both methods were considered to be compatible within ± 2 dilution limits. The categorical agreement between methods for each antifungal agent was assessed using clinical break points and epidemiological cut-off values. The agreement (± 2 dilution) between the methods was found to be species, drug, and incubation time dependent. After 24 hour incubation, good agreement category (> 90%) was detected between amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole and anidulofungin, but was lower category (< 85%) was determined with fluconazole and voriconazole especially for relatively slow growing C.glabrata and C.parapsilosis isolates. Excellent categorical agreement (100%) was observed for amfoterisin B/C.parapsilosis, C.glabrata, C.tropicalis and anidulofungin/C.albicans, C.glabrata, C.tropicalis but least category was determined for posaconazole and C.albicans (71.6% at 24 hour; 73% at 48 hour). In vitro resistance of therapeutically used fluconazole and anidulafungin determined by both methods was rare among C.albicans (1.3%, 2.7% respectively), C.glabrata (0%, 3.3% respectively) and C.tropicalis (0%, 5.6% respectively) isolates but, an increase of non-susceptible isolates were observed among C.parapsilosis (11.9% at 24 hour of incubation; 17.9% at 48 hour of incubation) for fluconazole. There was also a cross resistance between fluconazole and voriconazole for three C.parapsilosis isolates and one multidrug resistant (fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and anidulofungin) C.albicans isolate (fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and anidulofungin). As a result in this study, it was determined thatboth methods were similar and can be used according to preference of laboratories. The CLSI antifungal susceptibility test results can be assessed at the end of 24 hour incubation, but sometimes it is important that the evaluation should be performed as a result of 48 hour incubation in slow growing species such as C.glabrata.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Candida İzolatlarının Antifungal Duyarlılığının Belirlenmesinde Klinik Laboratuvar Standartları Enstitüsü (CLSI) ve Avrupa Antimikrobiyal Duyarlılık Testleri Komitesi (EUCAST) Sıvı Mikrodilüsyon Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması
Date Crossref
15/01/2018
Éditeur
Bilimsel Tip Publishing House
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesNail Diseases and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.