Physiological motion of the carotid atherosclerotic plaque quantified using ultrasound B-Mode image analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Physical motion throughout the cardiac cycle may contribute to the rupture of the atherosclerotic carotid plaque, resulting in ischaemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to quantify the physiological motion of the atherosclerotic carotid plaque and to investigate any relationship between the quantified motion parameters and the degree of stenosis, greyscale plaque characteristics, and the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms. Methods Displacement, velocity and acceleration of 81 plaques (51% symptomatic, stenosis range 10%-95%) from 51 patients were measured using an automated system employing a block matching algorithm relative to the ultrasound probe and relative to the periadventitial tissues, over a mean duration of 5 cardiac cycles. Results Averaged across all plaques, the displacement amplitude was 1.2 mm relative to the probe, and 0.35 mm relative to the periadventitial tissues. Maximum and mean plaque velocities were 4.7 and 1.3 mm/s relative to the ultrasound probe, and 2.4 and 0.70 mm/s relative to the periadventitial tissues. The corresponding acceleration magnitudes were 69 and 22 mm/s 2 relative to the probe, and 57 and 18 mm/s 2 relative to the periadventitial tissues. There were no significant differences in any of the motion parameters, with respect to the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, and none of the parameters showed a statistically significant relationship to the degree of stenosis, and the greyscale plaque characteristics (p≤0.05). The technique used was able to detect plaque motion amplitudes above 50μm. Conclusions This study provides quantitative data on the physiological motion of the atherosclerotic carotid plaque in-vivo . No significant relationship was found between the measured motion parameters and the presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, the degree of stenosis, and the greyscale plaque characteristics.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.