Aller au contenu principal
2017 article

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview for Patients With Severe Burn in Taiwan

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Post-traumatic Syndrome Scale-Interview (C-PSSI) for severe burn victims of the Formosa Fun Coast Explosion that occurred in Taiwan. A purposive sampling, cross-sectional, descriptive design study was selected. Participants were patients with severe burns from the Formosa Fun Coast Explosion, selected from teaching medical centers in Taiwan. They completed the C-PSSI and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties, including reliability, construct validity (using confirmatory factor analysis), convergent validity, and criterion-related validity of the questionnaire. Data on 63 participants were analyzed. The Cronbach's α of the entire C-PSSI was .88, ranging from .73 to .82 for the three subscales of this instrument. The item-total correlation coefficient was from .42 to .81. Examining the convergent validity revealed that two subscores of the C-PSSI were significantly correlated with PHQ-9 total scores (ρ = .58, .44, P < .01). Criterion-related validity was confirmed because the PHQ-9 total scores were significantly correlated with the total C-PSSI scores (ρ = .54, P < .01). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity, with a good model fit. Integrated moderate to good psychometric properties were demonstrated and a three-factor model of the C-PSSI was verified in patients with severe burn in Taiwan. The C-PSSI exhibited adequate psychometric properties for posttraumatic stress disorder evaluation in patients with severe burn in Taiwan. The Chinese version of this scale can be used to assess the psychological problems of victims of traumatic events.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview for Patients With Severe Burn in Taiwan
Date Crossref
04/12/2017
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Response and ManagementTraumatic Brain Injury Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.