Stroke code simulation lab
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The lack of standardized training for neurology residents in the management of stroke codes allows for suboptimal care, and may negatively impact patients' outcome.We designed and implemented a stroke code simulation lab with the objective of improving door to needle time for acute stroke thrombolytic therapy.Method: Thirteen trainees were enrolled in the simulation lab.Each participant was asked to lead a mock stroke code performed on a standardized patient.The mock cases included clinical vignettes that mimicked real-life scenarios.The effect of the simulation lab on the trainees' level of knowledge was assessed using pre-and post-course tests and a course survey.To test whether implementing a simulation lab reflected directly on patients' outcome, a 12-month retrospective chart review to compare door-to-needle time DNT before and after stroke codes was undertaken.Results: Door-to-needle time improved by 12 minutes following the implementation of the simulation lab (52 minutes before, versus 40 minutes after.P value 0.012).Pre-and post-training knowledge test scores improved from 61% to 81%.(p=0.00002).A 6-question survey showed that the course was received favorably by the participating trainees.Conclusion: Stroke code simulation lab can be an effective tool in improving neurology residents' knowledge of responding to and managing stroke codes.Moreover, the simulation reduced door-to-needle time indicating its potential usefulness in improving patient outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Stroke code simulation lab
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2017
- Éditeur
- Open Access Text Pvt, Ltd.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.