Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2017 article

Synthetic analysis of associations between IL-10 polymorphisms and skin cancer risk

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

// Hongbo Zhao 1 , Jiaoli Yang 1 , Zhenzhen Yu 1 , Hui Shen 1 , Xinlin Huang 1 , Mi Zhang 1 , Teng Long 1 , Cailing A 1 and Wenhui Wang 2 1 Department of Dermatology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China 2 Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China Correspondence to: Wenhui Wang, email: whwang_shiyan@126.com Keywords: IL-10; skin cancer; polymorphism; meta-analysis Received: September 04, 2017 Accepted: December 04, 2017 Published: December 17, 2017 ABSTRACT The current study was designed to quantitatively summarize the evidence for the strength of the associations between common IL-10 functional polymorphisms and skin cancer risk. Relevant publications concerning the associations between common IL-10 functional polymorphisms(–1082G>A, –819C>T and –592C>A) and skin cancer were retrieved by a comprehensive electronic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan­fang, Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to assess the strength of the relationship. A total of 26 studies including 4090 cases and 4133 controls (–1082G>A, 10 studies with 1809 cases and 1830 controls; –819C>T, 7 studies with 862 cases and 957 controls; –592C>A, 9 studies with 1419 cases and 1346 controls) were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Overall, the results revealed a borderline decreased risk of skin cancer in heterozygote model (OR = 0.82, 95CI = 0.67–1.00, p = 0.05). The subgroup analysis also presented similar association for non-melanoma skin cancer in heterozygote model (OR = 0.67, 95CI = 0.50–0.91, p = 0.01). Moreover, the further analysis based on the histological type of non-melanoma skin cancer indicated a significantly decreased risk of BCC in allele model (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50–0.91, p = 0.02) and dominant model (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48–0.98, p = 0.04). However, neither overall analysis nor subgroup analysis based on cancer subtype revealed a significant association of –1082G>A or –592C>A polymorphisms with skin cancer. The present study suggested a potential association between IL-10 –819C>T polymorphism and decreased risk of skin cancer, but a lack of association for –1082G>A and –592C>A polymorphisms. Further invalidation is urgently needed.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Synthetic analysis of associations between IL-10 polymorphisms and skin cancer risk
Date Crossref
17/12/2017
Éditeur
Impact Journals, LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Hubei University of Medicine Department of Dermatology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Dermatology — Hubei University of Medicine.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.