Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2017 article

To compare the efficacy of topical negative pressure dressing with that of conventional moist wound dressings, in healing of wounds

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Wounds and their management are fundamental to the practice of surgery. In the past 15 years there have been significant advances in complex acute and chronic wound management. One of the most significant discoveries was the improvement in wounds with negative pressure–assisted wound closure. The aim and objective of the study was efficacy of topical negative pressure dressing with that of a control group using conventional moist wound dressings, in healing of wounds, were assessed with quality of wound healing.Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study 50 patients with acute and traumatic wounds, sub-acute wounds, chronic open wounds, of which 25 patients underwent topical negative pressure dressing. The remaining 25 patients underwent conventional moist wound dressings. The results were compared after second week. Wounds were assessed depending on wound size and percentage of reduction of wound size, wound bed score and increase in wound bed score, percentage of granulation tissue cover, graft take up as the percentage of ulcer surface area.Results: Our present study shows significant reduction in wound size, in the study group 19.52 cm2 as compare to control group, (6.64 cm2) found to be statistically significant (p <0.001). There is significant increase in wound bed score in the study group (mean difference was 9.60±2.16) where as in the control group there was not much increase in wound bed score (mean difference was 5.12±1.99) (p-valve 0.00001) which is statistically significant. The % of granulation tissue formation in the study group was 81.0±8.29 and in the control group was 53.60±19.23.Conclusions: Topical negative pressure dressing was better than conventional wound dressings in quality of wound healing.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
To compare the efficacy of topical negative pressure dressing with that of conventional moist wound dressings, in healing of wounds
Date Crossref
25/11/2017
Éditeur
Medip Academy
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences Department of Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • SGT Medical College Department of Surgery pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Surgery — Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University et Department of Surgery — SGT Medical College.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Surgical Sutures and AdhesivesWound Healing and TreatmentsSurgical site infection prevention

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.