Adapter les itinéraires sylvicoles pour atténuer les effets du changement climatique. Résultats pour la chênaie sessiliflore française à partir des réseaux d’expérimentations sylvicoles

Le résumé fourni par la source

The effects of population density and summer drought were analysed by means of diameter and height growth in sessile oaks (Quercus petraea) on the stand and individual tree scales. Dendrometric inventory data collected from two networks of silvicultural experimentation were used (LERFOB and GIS Coop networks, 9 sites, 31 plots, 99 inventories, ages from 10 to 120 years). These networks study the effects of a broad range of densities, from freely growing trees (relative density index, or RDI, close to 0) to maximum density situations where self-thinning occurs (RDI equal to or in excess of 1). Climate conditions vary from 660 to 850 mm per year with a heat gradient of 9.5 to 11.5 °C (average 1990-2010). Generally speaking, density very strongly affects tree and stand growth, with drought playing a secondary role that is nonetheless significant. Overtopped trees contribute very little to the growth of the stand, particularly when the stand is dense. Drought reduces growth, particularly that of non-dominant trees. Density and drought therefore have the same effect: they accentuate growth differences between trees when stresses are greater. By allocating more resources to diameter growth as compared to height growth, trees in open stands are more "stocky". In contrast, in densely populated stands, there is "a race for light" making for greater height growth, especially that of overtopped trees. In all cases, drought has a greater effect in reducing height growth than in reducing diameter growth. Finally, following a particularly severe drought (1976), trees recovered most quickly at the drier sites (recovery in 2 years) while the overtopped trees in the higher density stands recovered very little (still no recovery 7 years later). These results suggest that sessile oak adapts better in drier conditions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.