P4256Outsourcing of remote management of cardiac implantable electronic devices through an external remote monitoring center: an efficacy and safety evaluation
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Several studies have demonstrated that remote management (RM) reduces the total number of in-office visits, without negative effects on patient outcomes. Nevertheless, some workflow changes are required in daily practice, which requires new definition of roles and responsibilities, within the hospital clinical teams. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) to remotely manage and follow-up patients wearing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Methods: A flow-chart describing timings, role and responsibilities has been agreed between hospital physicians and the ERMC staff. With the aim of effectively reviewing transmissions and managing all possible clinical and technical relevant events, a transmission code classification was defined by the hospital physicians to prioritise device clinical and technical conditions, and the associated actions (e-mails, phone contacts and specific comments on the RM platform websites). In case of missed transmission or disconnected monitors, the EMRC staff contacted the patient by phone for investigation and troubleshooting and, if a technical issue was highlighted, the ERMC team would involve the team responsible to fix it. A comparison with the standard RM, where patients' transmissions were reviewed directly by the hospital staff without a pre-defined protocol is also presented.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P4256Outsourcing of remote management of cardiac implantable electronic devices through an external remote monitoring center: an efficacy and safety evaluation
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2017
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Hospital of Cefalu (Istituto San Raffaele G.Giglio) pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
HTN (Health Telematics Network) pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù, Hospital of Cefalu (Istituto San Raffaele G.Giglio) et HTN (Health Telematics Network).
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.