P6450Haemorrhagic risk in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and renal dysfunction: which score is a better predictor of bleeding risk on a daily-basis?
Rattachement africain : pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndromes are often complicated by potentially fatal haemorrhagic events. Patients with concomitant renal dysfunction are a particularly susceptible group to this type of complication and are frequently underrepresented in the literature, as different evidence gaps remain to be explored. Methods: Prospective registry of 545 consecutive patients admitted between October 2009 and September 2016 presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome and renal dysfunction (CrCl ≤60 ml/min, Cockcroft-Gault equation). CRUSADE bleeding Score (Cs), ATRIA bleeding score (As) and ORBIT Score (Os) were then calculated for each patient. A comparison between the different scores regarding their prediction value, was then established using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curves and the deLong test. As a primary endpoint we defined the occurrence of a haemorrhagic event resulting in blood transfusion and then aimed to evaluate the scores performance on different subsets of patients: those presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or Unstable Angina (NSTEMI/UA).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- P6450Haemorrhagic risk in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and renal dysfunction: which score is a better predictor of bleeding risk on a daily-basis?
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2017
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.