DNA damage repair and response (DDR) gene alterations (alt) and response to PD1/PDL1 blockade in platinum-treated metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

Le résumé fourni par la source

4509 Background: Somatic DDR alts are associated with increased mutation load (ML) and improved clinical outcomes for platinum-treated mUC (Teo et al, CCR 2017). We examined the relationship between DDR alts and response to PD1/PDL1 blockade. Methods: mUC pts enrolled to phase 2 trials of atezolizumab or nivolumab who had targeted exon sequencing of 410 genes (MSK-IMPACT) were identified. Pts were dichotomized based on presence of alts in a panel of 34 DDR genes. Analyses were performed based on: (1) any DDR alts and (2) deleterious DDR alts (frameshift, splice site, nonsense or Hotspot point mutations). Study endpoint was overall response (OR) per RECIST. ML was defined as total number of nonsynonymous mutations by MSK-IMPACT. Fisher exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and stratified logistic regression were used. Results: Fifty two pts were identified (atezo: n=18, nivo: n=34). Median age was 67 years (range: 32 – 84) and majority (44) was male. Median platinum-free interval was 10.2 months (range: 0.3 – 150.4). DDR and deleterious DDR were seen in 25 (48.1%) and 14 (26.9%) pts (including 2 MSI and 1 POLE). OR rate was 46.2%. Responses were associated with DDR alts but not with age, gender, treatment, platinum-free interval or ML (table). In univariate logistic regression model, DDR status was associated with OR (p<.001) while a trend was observed with ML as a continuous variable (p=.051). While DDR alts were associated with higher ML (all: p=.001, deleterious: p=.004), the effect of DDR alts on OR remained significant regardless of ML (>median: p=.027; ≤median: p=.023), indicating that the effect of DDR was independent of ML. Conclusions: DDR alts appeared to be associated with OR to PD1/PDL1 blockade and should be integrated into future validation efforts along with other potential predictors of response. [Table: see text]

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.