Is AZT/3TC/NVP still the best choice? Clinical outcomes of antiretroviral therapy in Ugandan client cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Several studies have found that Tenofovir-containing regimens (TDF-CR) are associated with less drug substitution and better tolerance when compared with Zidovudine (AZT)-containing regimens. However, results on mortality and retention are conflicting, with some observational studies suggesting that AZT+Lamivudine(3TC)+Nevirapine (NVP) could be associated with better outcomes Conclusions: A strong association was found between receiving AZT+3TC+NVP during the first year of ART and better survival and retention compared with TDF-CR. Inferiority of TDF+3TC+NVP has been suggested in comparative studies before. For TDF+3TC+EFV, we hypothesized that in contexts like the one in our study, with limited access to investigations and reduced capacity to rule out opportunistic infections (OI), the increased potency of TDF+3TC+EFV to suppress viral replication (and therefore to cause more severe immune-reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in those with undetected OIs) could be one factor to explain its negative performance
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Is AZT/3TC/NVP still the best choice? Clinical outcomes of antiretroviral therapy in Ugandan client cohort
- Date Crossref
- 24/05/2016
- Éditeur
- F1000 Research Ltd
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.