A meta-analysis of antibacterial envelope use in prevention of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection has been a major clinical problem in addition to being a major financial burden. In spite of antimicrobial prophylaxis, CIED infection rates have been increasing disproportionately. We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to assess the role of TYRX antibiotic envelope for the prevention of CIED infection. Methods: Using extensive online search, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting CIED infections with versus without the use of TYRX antibiotic envelope. A random-effect model was used, and between studies heterogeneity was estimated with I 2 . All analyses were performed with RevMan (version 5.0.20). Results: Five cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of included studies was 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09–0.94; p < 0.004]. There was evidence of heterogeneity with I 2 of 58%. There was also evidence of publication bias on funnel plot analysis. On sensitivity analysis, no statistically significant difference was noted when stratified by study design or duration of follow-up. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of TYRX antibiotic envelope for the prevention of CIED infections.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A meta-analysis of antibacterial envelope use in prevention of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2017
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.