Psychosocial aspect of quality of life among working and unemployed nurses and midwives
Rattachement africain : pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to explain differences in the subjective evaluation of the psychological and social aspects of quality of life in a group of working and unemployed nurses and midwives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The survey was conducted in a group of 620 professionally-active and inactive people (315 nurses and 305 midwives), selected by random stratified-systematic sampling. The tool used to gather empirical material was the standardized questionnaire WHOQoL-100. RESULTS: Professionally-active nurses evaluated the mental domain less favourably (M=12.33), compared with unemployed nurses (M=12.73), and the difference between average values was statistically significant (p=.043). It is also worth noting that in the group of midwives there were significant differences in each discussed domain. The unemployed respondents evaluated more positively the overall quality of life (M=14.29; p=.005) and the mental domain (M=12.85; p=.009), while the social domain was evaluated less favourably by the professionally-active midwives (M=12.73; p=.022). CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxically, those who were unemployed made slightly more positive evaluations in comparison with the professionally active. Professional work is not a factor preferably affecting the quality of life and its psychosocial dimension. The higher quality of life of the unemployed respondents may result from the buffering impact of social support.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Psychosocial aspect of quality of life among working and unemployed nurses and midwives
- Date Crossref
- 21/09/2017
- Éditeur
- Institute of Rural Health
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Medical University of Lublin pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Lublin Oncology Center pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
University of Economics and Innovation pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Instytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Basic Nursing and Medical Teaching pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Center of Oncology of Lublin Region pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Institute of Rural Health in Lublin Department of Biostatistics pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Medical University of Lublin, Lublin Oncology Center et University of Economics and Innovation, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.