Open-Domain Question Answering Framework Using Wikipedia
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper explores the feasibility of implementing a model for an open domain, automated question and answering framework that leverages Wikipedia’s knowledgebase. While Wikipedia implicitly comprises answers to common questions, the disambiguation of natural language and the difficulty of developing an information retrieval process that produces answers with specificity present pertinent challenges. However, observational analysis suggests that it is possible to discount the syntactical and lexical structure of a sentence in contexts where questions contain a specific target entity (words that identify a person, location or organisation) and that correspondingly query a property related to it. To investigate this, we implemented an algorithmic process that extracted the target entity from the question using CRF based named entity recognition (NER) and utilised all remaining words as potential properties. Using DBPedia, an ontological database of Wikipedia’s knowledge, we searched for the closest matching property that would produce an answer by applying standardised string matching algorithms including the Levenshtein distance, similar text and Dice’s coefficient. Our experimental results illustrate that using Wikipedia as a knowledgebase produces high precision for questions that contain a singular unambiguous entity as the subject, but lowered accuracy for questions where the entity exists as part of the object.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Open-Domain Question Answering Framework Using Wikipedia
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2016
- Éditeur
- Springer International Publishing
- Type
- book-chapter
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.