Association between rigors and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2).

Le résumé fourni par la source

487 Background: HD IL-2 is associated with an objective response rate of 16-20% with durability of response in select mRCC patients. HD IL-2 is also associated with significant toxicity including vascular leak syndrome and inflammatory side effects. Few predictive markers can identify patients likely to respond to HD IL-2. Methods: Patients treated with HD IL-2 at the University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute from 2000 to 2012 with clear cell mRCC were evaluated. Grade of toxicities during HD IL-2 treatment were collected based on provider documentation in the electronic health record. Rates of adverse events (AEs) and overall survival stratified grade 3 AEs were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. All AEs were graded per common terminology criteria version 4. Grade 3 rigors were defined as severe rigors requiring opioids. Results: A total of 85 patients were included with a median age of 56 years (range 32-76 years) and 79% (n = 67) were male. Patients belonged to the following MSKCC risk categories: 11 (13%) good, 70 (82%) intermediate, and 4 (5%) poor risk. The mean total dose received was 1097 MIU (range: 160 – 3048 MIU). The prevalence of grade 3 AEs is presented in the table. Median survival of patients with ≥grade 3 rigors after HD IL-2 administration was 1501 days vs 533 days for those without (p = 0.0005, HR 2.54). Presence of rigors was also associated with a significant improvement in progression free survival, time to next treatment and response rates. No other AEs predicted response to HD IL-2. Conclusions: Presence of grade 3 rigors predicts improved survival during HD IL-2 therapy. Notably, grade 3 fever was rarely observed because of our institutional protocol of routinely using scheduled antipyretics to diminish fevers. [Table: see text]

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.