Aller au contenu principal
2016 article

Vascular access, cerebral air embolism and hyperbaric oxygen therapy

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Although very comprehensive, the AAGBI safe vascular access guideline fails to mention the important role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the management of air embolism complicating vascular access 1. Depending on the speed and quantity of air/gas entrainment, cardiac arrest may be irreversible. Some patients are resuscitated successfully; others have insidious onset, presenting with air in the coronary or cerebral circulation. The latter present with varied neurological signs, but a ‘peri-procedural stroke’ should trigger suspicion of cerebral air embolism, a life-threatening emergency. Although there are case reports of these being aspirated percutaneously, the most effective treatment is urgent HBOT 2-4. The outcome is dependent on HBOT within 6–8 h, akin to early thrombolysis in thromboembolic stroke. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy beyond this ideal window should still be considered and discussed with experts in the field. Good outcomes from delayed HBOT may be more likely related to retrograde cerebral venous air embolism rather than cerebral arterial air embolism. Peripheral venous lines have been described many times as a source of cerebral gas embolism, and the absence of a central line should not exclude the diagnosis. The pathophysiology of gas bubbles in the cerebral vascular system and the mechanism of HBOT has been clearly described 5. The diagnosis may be difficult, and a high index of suspicion is required in case of a peri-procedural neurological event, including any form of vascular procedure. Sometimes the diagnosis is inevitably associated with delays, but once the diagnosis is made, every minute counts. For that reason, clear guidance is essential. The quoted incidence of 0.8% of all air embolism events translates into several dozen cases per year of significant cerebral gas embolism, which currently may be missed in the UK 1. The incidence may be higher 2-4. Vascular-related air embolism has recently been removed from the ‘Never Event’ list in the UK and it will be interesting to see if the rate of reporting will change. The British Hyperbaric Association has guidance on their website about how to access emergency HBOT in a suitable Category 1 unit (able to deal with critically ill patients) 6.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Vascular access, cerebral air embolism and hyperbaric oxygen therapy
Date Crossref
18/12/2016
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.