Inhaled GM-CSF in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) patient refractory to plasmapheresis combined with multiple whole lung lavages (WLL)
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: A patient with autoimmune PAP with persistent disease underwent 3 WLL, 10 plasmapheresis cycles and further 3 WLL, from October 2004 to May 2007. Despite a substantial clinical and functional benefit, the radiographic appearance showed a partial resolution of lung infiltrates(1). At the beginning of 2010, after a worsening of respiratory conditions, the patient was admitted to inhaled GM-CSF (Sagramostin) therapy as compassionate treatment. Methods: GM-CSF, dispensed byAkita 2 nebulizer (Vectura),was administered following:250 mcg/day every other week for 12 weeks, then 250 mcg/day on 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks for 6 months. Follow up visits were scheduled at 3, 10, 18, 30 months and after that once a year. Functional and HRCT data and PaO2 were collected. Results: From the start of the inhalatory therapy the patient no more required WLL. Furthermore we found a significant increase in DLCO%(p=0.013) and FVC%(p=0.023) while FEV1% show a positive trend(Fig.1). No substantial differences in blood gas analysis. The pulmonary involvement at HRCT shows a significant decrease of lung infiltrates(p=0.039) in terms of pathological segments. Conclusion: These data underscore the utility of inhaled GM-CSF not only in case of progressing disease but also in case of persistence/stabilization, in order to increase response rate. 1.Luisetti et al. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 1220–1222.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Inhaled GM-CSF in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) patient refractory to plasmapheresis combined with multiple whole lung lavages (WLL)
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2016
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.