Thrombophilia in Retinal Vessel Thrombosis.
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Abstract 5072 Background Retinal vessel thrombosis (RVT) is the second most common retinal vascular disease after diabetic retinopathy, and is a common cause of visual morbidity. The role of thrombophilia in the pathogenesis of RVT remains under investigation. Methods Retrospective analysis. Between 2001 and 2009, the medical records and laboratory reports performed on patients (pts) with retinal vessel thrombosis who underwent thrombophilic evaluation were reviewed. The thrombophilic laboratory evaluation consisted of: Factor V mutation analysis, Factor II mutation analysis, Protein C activity, Protein S activity, antithrombin-III activity, Factor VIII activity, homocystein level, Methyl tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation analysis, and anticardiolipin antibodies. Results 9 pts were identified. All but 2 pts were females. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (31-78). Factor V Leiden was found in 1 pt. MTHFR C677T heterozygous mutation was present in 4 pts, and in 2 of these, hyperhomocystinemia was present as well. Anticardiolipin antibodies were elevated in 6 pts, and in 2 pts it was the only laboratory abnormality. One pt with hyperlipidemia had a negative thrombophilic laboratory testing. Conclusions Although newer laboratory methods are able to detect coagulation defects, their clinical relevance in retinal vessel thrombosis requires additional research. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Thrombophilia in Retinal Vessel Thrombosis.
- Date Crossref
- 20/11/2009
- Éditeur
- American Society of Hematology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.