A protocol for the use of closed reduction in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip incorporating open psoas and adductor releases and a short-leg cast

Le résumé fourni par la source

AIMS: Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of a protocol involving a standardised closed reduction for the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in maintaining reduction and to report the mid-term results. METHODS: A total of 133 hips in 120 children aged less than two years who underwent closed reduction, with a minimum follow-up of five years or until subsequent surgery, were included in the study. The protocol defines the criteria for an acceptable reduction and the indications for a concomitant soft-tissue release. All children were immobilised in a short- leg cast for three months. Arthrograms were undertaken at the time of closed reduction and six weeks later. Follow-up radiographs were taken at six months and one, two and five years later and at the latest follow-up. The Tönnis grade, acetabular index, Severin grade and signs of osteonecrosis were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 67 hips (51%) were Tönnis grade 3/4 hips. By 12 months, 20 reductions (15%) had not been maintained, and these required open reduction. In all, 55% of these were Severin 1; the others were Severin 2, due to minor acetabular dysplasia. Of the 113 successful closed reductions, 98 hips (87%) were Severin 1. Surgery for residual DDH was offered for ten hips. Osteonecrosis was seen in 32 hips (29%) but was transient in 28. In total, two children (1.5%) had severe osteonecrosis. Bilateral dislocations were significantly more likely to fail and most Tönnis 4 hips failed. CONCLUSION: Closed reduction, with concomitant adductor and psoas release when required and the use of a short leg plaster of Paris cast for three months, can produce good mid-term results in children with DDH aged less than two years. This protocol is not recommended for Tönnis 4 hips. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1548-53.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.