SP765RESPONSE TO HEPATITIS B VACCINE AMONG HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS. A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction and Aims: Hemodialysis patients are particularly vulnerable to hepatitis B virus (HBV) and have less sustained and lower antibody response to HBV vaccination. The aim of this study was to identify factors that could affect this response. Methods: We retrospectively studied n=105 patients (42 women and 63 men) on chronic hemodialysis, who had initial titer of antibodies against the surface antigen of HBV (HBsAb) less than 10 IU/l. All patients received initially four doses of recombinated vaccine at months 0,1,2 και 6. Results: After the initial vaccination 52 patients (49,5%) developed HBsAb ≥10 IU/l, 29 of which (27,6%) developed very high HbsAb levels (≥100 IU/l). Responders (HBsAb ≥10 IU/l) were younger (54,7 ± 16 versus 62,5 ± 13 years, p=0,026). The achieved HBsAb titer correlated to the age of the patients (r=-0,353, p=0,002) and to dialysis adequacy (urea reduction ratio, r=0,294, p=0,024). Lower response rates were observed among smokers (32,1% versus 55,8%, p=0,032). Furthermore, men tended to respond more frequently (55,6%) than women (40,5%, p=0,130). Finally, obese patients tended to achieve less frequently high titers HBsAb (≥100 IU/l, 17,9% versus 32,4%, p=0,140). Five out of 18 (27,8%) non-responders responded to an additional dose of HBV vaccine, whereas 11 out of 18 non-responders (61,1%) responded to a second course of four doses. The mean drop of the HbsAb titer after succeful vacination was -49,3% ± 32% per year. Men tended to have a faster rate of decline of the HbsAb titer (-56,2% ± 33%) compared to women (-41,8% ± 28% per year, p=0,062).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- SP765RESPONSE TO HEPATITIS B VACCINE AMONG HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS. A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2015
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.