Variables Associated with Improved Left Ventricular Function after Myocardial Revascularization
Rattachement africain : ar. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Myocardial revascularization is the treatment of choice in patients with ischemic systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) constitutes a prognostic factor in these patients, so it is of interest to identify the variables related with left ventricular function improvement.Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the variables associated with improvement of LVEF in patients with ischemic systolic dysfunction undergoing myocardial revascularization. Methods: Patients with LVEF <50% undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization with echocardiographic monitoring ≥6months were included in the study. The variables associated with LVEF improvement >5% were analyzed. Results: The cohort consisted of 95 patients; 91.6% were men, mean age was 63 years, 40% were diabetic, 27% had previous myocardial infarction and LVEF was 36%±6%. Viability was assessed in 78% of cases. During the immediate postoperative period, 12.6% of patients presented ischemia and 28% low cardiac output. Multivariate analysis revealed that myocardial viability and lack of perioperative ischemia were independent predictors of LVEF improvement.Conclusions: Myocardial viability and absence of perioperative ischemia were associated with improved LVEF during long-term follow-up.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Variables Associated with Improved Left Ventricular Function after Myocardial Revascularization Variables asociadas con la mejoría de la función ventricular luego de la revascularización miocárdica
- Date Crossref
- 06/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Revista Argentina de Cardiologia
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.