Aller au contenu principal
2003 article

Intracoronary beta-radiation for the treatment of patients at very high risk for recurrence of in-stent restenosis: a single center experience.

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary brachytherapy has significantly reduced the recurrence of in-stent restenosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of intracoronary beta-radiation in patients at very high risk for recurrence of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: We analyzed 42 patients with 50 lesions submitted to catheter-based beta-radiation (Beta-Cath System, Novoste Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA) for in-stent restenosis. Thirty-eight lesions were at the second restenosis, 8 at the third, and 4 at the fourth; a diffuse pattern was present in 78%. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed for 30 lesions (60%) and the cutting balloon technique for 20 (40%). In 12 lesions further 14 stents had to be deployed (28%). The delivery catheter was successfully positioned in 96% of the procedures. The mean dwell time was 179 +/- 50 s with a radiation dose ranging from 18.4 to 25.3 Gy, depending on the vessel size. A complete angiographic success without coronary dissection and without any additional stenting after radiation delivery was achieved in 86%. At follow-up (7.2 +/- 2.1 months), the overall restenosis rate was 30.4% (14 lesions). A recurrence was detected in 1/11 lesions with initial focal pattern and in 13/39 lesions with initial diffuse pattern. The restenosis rate was higher in patients in whom a geographic miss had occurred (p < 0.05 vs lesions without geographic miss) and in those in whom a new stent had been deployed (p < 0.05 vs lesions treated without a stent). CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy reduces the in-stent restenosis rate in patients who are at very high risk of recurrence. The restenosis pattern, geographic miss and new stent deployment seem to be negative prognostic factors for recurrence of restenosis.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • MultiMedica pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • European Institute of Oncology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • U.O. di Emodinamica Istituto Clinico Humanitas Via Manzoni pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca, MultiMedica et Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.