Aller au contenu principal
2016 conference-abstract

CP-104 Adherence to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background A lack of adherence to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can increase inflammatory activity (IA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Purpose To estimate adherence to subcutaneous biological (DMARD-b) and conventional (DMARD-c) DMARDs in RA patients. To evaluate IA as a function of DMARD adherence. Material and methods Cross sectional study in pharmaceutical care outpatients with RA receiving DMARD-b at a 550 bed hospital in April 2015. Study variables: age, sex, DMARDs, adherence and IA. Adherence was evaluated by two indirect methods: (1) patient self-administered questionnaire (CQR5-Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology); and (2) electronic dispensation records, calculating the ‘medication possession rate’ (MPR), defined as the number of days a medication was dispensed divided by the number of days of the treatment period during the previous 12 months. ‘Adherent’ patients were defined by MPR ≥80% and CQR5 classification of ‘high adherence’. DAS28 was used to evaluate IA as in remission (DAS28 ≤2.6), low (DAS28 ≤3.2) or moderate (DAS28 >3.2). Data were obtained from: electronic clinical records, community pharmacy electronic prescription dispensing programmes (specialists and community physicians), outpatient dispensing records and pharmaceutical interview. Statistical analysis: Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare IA between adherence and non-adherence groups to combination therapy with DMARD-b and DMARD-c. . Results The study included 55 patients (81.8% females, mean age 56 ± 14.0 yrs) treated with DMARD-b (50.9% etanercept, 30.9% adalimumab,12.7% certolizumab, 5.5% golimumab): 19 with monotherapy and 36 associated with DMARD-c (72.2% methotrexate,13.9% leflunomide,13.9% others). 81.8% of patients were adherent to DMARD-b (89.5% with monotherapy). Adherence was higher for adalimumab (82.4%) than for other DMARD-b. In the combination therapy group, 58.3% were adherent to both (DMARD-b 77.7%, DMARD-c 72.2%). Adherence was higher to leflunomide (80.0%) than to methotrexate (69.2%). Among the 17 adherent patients receiving DMARD-b monotherapy, IA was in remission in 35.3%, low in 17.6%, moderate in 35.3% and high in 11.8%. Among non-adherent patients, 1 was in remission and 1 had low IA. Comparing the adherence and non-adherence groups receiving combination therapy, IA was in remission in 38.9% vs. 30.8% (p > 0.05), low in 22.2% vs. 30.8% (p > 0.05) and moderate in 38.9% vs. 38.4% (p > 0.05), respectively. Conclusion Adherence to DMARD-b was high in RA patients. Adherence to the combination therapy was lower, being higher for DMARD-b than for DMARD-c. Non-adherence to this combination therapy does not appear to increase IA. References and/or Acknowledgements Hughes. A 5 item version of the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology (CQR5) successfully identifies low adherence to DMARDS. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2013;14:286-94 No conflict of interest.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
CP-104 Adherence to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Date Crossref
14/02/2016
Éditeur
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Ciudad Real University General Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real et Ciudad Real University General Hospital.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.