Determination of Nicarbazin in Chicken Tissues By Liquid Chromatography and Confirmation of Identity By Thermospray Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A liquid chromatographic method is described for the quantitative measurement of nicarbazin in chicken liver, fat, muscle, and skin tissues. The 4,4'-dinitrocarbanilide (DNC) portion of nicarbazin is extracted from tissues with ethyl acetate. After filtration and evaporation, the extract is purified by liquid-liquid partitioning with acetonitrile-hexane and alumina cartridge chromatography. DNC is separated and measured by reverse-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) with an octadecylsilyl (ODS) column and a UV detector set at 340 nm. The overall average recovery of DNC added to tissues was 83.4 +/- 3.1%. The lowest level validated in tissues by this procedure was 0.10 ppm. The limit of detection was estimated to be 0.020 ppm. This method provides a sensitive, selective, rapid, and reproducible alternative to existing purification, separation, and detection techniques, such as differential pulse polarography and colorimetry, for determination of nicarbazin in chicken tissues. Identity of DNC is confirmed by subjecting the purified extracts to thermospray-LC/mass spectrometric analysis using negative-ion detection and selected ion monitoring. Three structural-indicating ions at m/z 302, 272, and 164 are monitored in the thermospray-mass spectrum which are characteristic of the DNC molecule.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Determination of Nicarbazin in Chicken Tissues By Liquid Chromatography and Confirmation of Identity By Thermospray Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/1989
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.