Aller au contenu principal
2000 other

[Conditions of practice and results of colonoscopy in non-university hospitals. Results of a cross sectional, multicenter ANGH study (1)].

19Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe the conditions of practice and results of colonoscopies performed in non university hospital endoscopy units. METHODS: A study was suggested to all members of the National Association of non university Hospital Gastroenterologists (ANGH). During one week a questionnaire was filled out by the gastroenterologists for each colonoscopy. RESULTS: Eighty six hospitals (229 gastroenterologists) took part in this study including 840 explorations. Ninety one percent of them were complete and the result was abnormal in 49%: cancers (3%), polyps > or =1 cm (8%), polyps < 1 cm (20%) and colitis (5%). Colonoscopies were ambulatory in half of the cases. Sedation was used in 95% of the patients, 80% by the anesthesist and 15% by the gastroenterologist (conscious sedation). The recommendations of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care for ambulatory sedation were not totally respected (15% of patients left the endoscopy unit without assistance). Only 6% of colonoscopies were not well tolerated, because of pain or incidents rarely necessitating intensive care monitoring (5 cases) or prolonged hospitalization (2 cases). CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy provides good diagnostic yield although conditions of use can be improved.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.