Aller au contenu principal
2014 conference-abstract

159 Antiplatelet Therapy After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Anti-platelet therapy (APT) after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is a challenging and highly controversial situation, as the risk of hemorrhage progression must be weighed against the risk of thrombotic events. Currently, no data exist to guide clinicians. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients admitted to our institution with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage that received aspirin or clopidogrel during their initial hospitalization over a 3-year period. We reviewed their demographics, hospital course, APT indication, timing of APT initiation relative to the trauma, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were identified. The median age and Glasgow Coma Scale score of these patients was 61 and 13, respectively. Forty-eight (21.52%) patients required invasive neurosurgical procedures including intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors and/or open surgeries. Ninety-two patients (41.3%) received these medications because of previous APT use with a high thrombotic risk, and 86 patients (38.6%) had blunt cerebrovascular injuries. The median time from injury to starting APT was 4 days. Immediate complications including new hemorrhage or previous hemorrhage progression occurred in 6 (2.7%) patients, and 3 (1.4%) of these patients required a neurosurgical intervention. Delayed complications including progression of acute to chronic subdural hematoma (SDH) that required an operative intervention occurred in 5 (3.9%) patients. Thrombotic events occurred in 21 (9.4%) patients prior to starting APT. Thirteen (5.8%) of these events were potentially preventable because an APT indication existed, but the medications were withheld due to a perceived intracranial hemorrhage risk. CONCLUSION: For this patient population, the immediate and delayed intracranial hemorrhage risk from APT therapy must be weighed against the consequences of withholding these medications. Although further studies are in progress, our retrospective review provides the first complication rates for APT in traumatic intracranial hemorrhage patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
159 Antiplatelet Therapy After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
Date Crossref
01/08/2014
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Neurosurgical Procedures and ComplicationsIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.