Changed outcomes of fetuses with congenital heart disease
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the outcomes of fetuses with congenital heart disease between 2000 and 2005 in comparison to a previous multicentre study regarding the period 1983-1996. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Data of seven centres were prospectively collected, the inclusion criteria being a confirmed fetal diagnosis after birth or at autopsy and a known follow-up, for at least 6 months after birth. Data of 649 fetuses, median age at diagnosis 24 weeks' gestation (15-37), 340/649 (52.4%) diagnosed before 24 weeks, were analysed. RESULTS: Sixty seven and 59 cases had chromosomal or extracardiac anomalies (10.3 and 9.1%). Termination of pregnancy was chosen in 21.6% of cases versus 28.9% in the previous study, being significantly lower in cases with early diagnosis (P <0.001). Out of 509 fetuses continuing pregnancy, 23 died in utero (4.5%) and 110 (21.1%) postnatally, versus 43% in the previous study (P <0.0017). Total surgical/postprocedure death occurred in 20.6% (59/287 infants) versus 37% previously (P <0.003), 67 infants being premature and 35 with associated chromosomal or extracardiac anomalies. The current overall mortality rate was higher in cases with chromosomal or extracardiac anomalies (59.5 and 51.35%, respectively, whereas it was 20.1% in isolated congenital heart disease). Overall current survival was 376 of 509 (73.9%) versus 45% in the previous study (P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data show a reduced overall and surgical mortality, with respect to our previous study, resulting from resulting from an improved perinatal management and treatment of affected fetuses in the more recent era.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Changed outcomes of fetuses with congenital heart disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2015
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.