Management of ankle injuries
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A 26 year old woman presented to the emergency department after injuring her left ankle. While walking on an uneven pavement in the rain she lost her footing and described a sudden “buckling” of her ankle (plantar flexion and inversion injury). She could not bear weight so an ambulance was called. She was previously fit and well and was on no regular drugs. Six months earlier she had twisted the same ankle while playing hockey. Radiographs taken at the emergency department had been normal, and she was discharged with crutches and a compression bandage. She returned to work after two weeks but had not returned to sport because she did not trust her ankle. Clinical examination identified tenderness, swelling, and ecchymosis over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, with some bony tenderness on the posterior edge of the lateral malleolus. She had no medial tenderness. Ankle ligament stress testing was not performed owing to pain. ### 1. What is the most likely diagnosis? #### Short answer Lateral ankle ligamentous injury. #### Discussion The most common injury sustained during an ankle plantar flexion and inversion injury is a lateral ankle ligamentous injury. The bony architecture of the ankle joint is most stable in dorsiflexion. Ankle sprains are therefore more likely to occur with the ankle in plantar flexion because ligamentous support is more important. A 2014 meta-analysis found a higher incidence of ankle sprain in females than in males, in children than in adolescents, and in adolescents than in adults. Indoor and court …
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Management of ankle injuries
- Date Crossref
- 15/12/2015
- Éditeur
- BMJ
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.