Aller au contenu principal
2000 article

Roughage as additional rooting substrates for pigs

47Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Straw is frequently supplied as a rooting material to improve the welfare of pigs. In Denmark, organically raised slaughter pigs must have access to both straw and roughage. In order to evaluate whether roughage can he used as an appropriate rooting substrate for pigs, the effects of six different roughage types on pigs’ behaviour was examined. Pairs of 11-week-old pigs were placed in specially designed 4 m 2 pens. Each pen contained a self-feeder for cereal, a water bowl, a box for roughage, a straw- bedded area and a dunging area. Four replicates were carried out, each consisting of seven pairs of pigs. In each replicate, each pair of pigs was supplied with either whole-crop silage of oats, vetch and lupin ( Avena sativa, Vicia sativa, and Lupinus luteus (OVL), whole-crop silage of barley and peas ( Hordeum vulgare and Pisum sativum ssp. arvense ) (BP), whole-crop silage of clover and grass ( Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne (CG), green grass meal ( Poa ssp.) (GM), hay of clover and grass ( Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne (H), fodder beets ( Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) (B), or no roughage (the control treatment) (CON). The pigs manipulated OVL for longer than the other roughage products ( P < 0·01). When OVL was omitted from the analysis, B was manipulated for longer than CON ( P < 0·05). The pigs that were offered CON manipulated equipment for a longer time than pigs offered B ( P < 0·05) and tended to manipulate equipment for longer than pigs offered OVL ( P = 0·065). Interestingly, OVL and B were the two products with the lowest dry-matter content. It may suggest that the amount of time spent manipulating roughage will depend considerably on the specific characteristics of the roughage offered, for instance dry matter content and complexity but probably also texture, smell and taste. In addition, the time spent manipulating other elements in the pen will depend on the type of roughage offered. In conclusion, the present study shows that some, but not all, types of roughage are suited as an enrichment of the pig’s environment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Roughage as additional rooting substrates for pigs
Date Crossref
01/06/2000
Éditeur
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Danish Cattle Research Centre pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche

Danish Cattle Research Centre et Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.