Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology - contenuto non piu disponibile

Le résumé fourni par la source

Understanding the location of ethmoidal arteries (EAs) is crucial during endo- scopic sinus surgery or skull base surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical variability of EAs, considering their presence and position within the ethmoid bone and their position in relation to the skull base (SB) and the frontal sinus (FS). Fourteen human heads underwent a cone-beam CT scan and an endoscopic dissection was carried out to evaluate the anatomy of the EAs. Several features were assessed both radiologically and in the lab setting: presence; position according to the “5 doors theory” (1); position respect to the SB; distance from the SB; relation with the FS (2); dehiscence of the bony canal. Anterior EA and posterior EA were present in all cases, whereas the prevalence of the middle EA was 28.57±16.73%. Anterior EA was most frequently found (64.29%) in the basal lamella of the middle turbinate; it originated from the SB in 60.71% of cases and it was separated from the FS by a single bony lamella in 46.43%. Its canal was dehiscent in 46.43±18.47%. Posterior EA was almost equally found posterior to the basal lamella of the middle turbinate, in the basal lamella of the superior turbinate and posterior to it. It was found in the SB in 82.14% of the cases and its canal was dehiscent in the 28.57±16.73%. Middle EA was found posterior to the basal lamella of the middle turbinate in 62.50% of cas- es and it was found in the SB in 75.00% of the cases. These data demonstrate that, despite their constant presence, anterior and posterior EAs showed a variable position and relationship with the SB; in addition, the data showed a non-negligible number of cases in which the middle MEA was present. Therefore, because of these several anatomical variability in EAs, a high-spatial-resolution CT should be provided for the preoperative anatomical assessment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.