Prospective study of signalling pathways in myeloma bone disease with regard to activity of the disease, extent of skeletal involvement and correlation to bone turnover markers
Rattachement africain : cz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: The aim of our study was to address the utility of serum levels of selected parameters of myeloma bone disease (MBD) signalling with regard to the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM), activity, markers of bone turnover and extent of skeletal changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed prospectively 77 individuals with monoclonal gammopathies - 46 patients with active MM (AMM), 12 patients with smouldering MM (SMM) and 19 individuals with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to determine the role of HGF, MIP-1α, Syndecan-1, osteoprotegerin, Activin A, DKK1, Annexin A2 and NF-κB. RESULTS: We found significant differences of most of the parameters between MGUS and AMM, and with respect to the activity of MM assessed by International Staging System. Most of the parameters of MBD signalling correlated with traditional markers of bone turnover. CONCLUSIONS: All the signalling pathways were activated in MM with more pronounced osteoclastogenesis in comparison with bone formation but not in MGUS regardless of its risk category, suggesting that MBD is not activated in MGUS until the process of transformation into MM. The parameters of MBD signalling might precede the increase of conventional parameters of bone turnover suggesting their possible role in early indication of anti-resorption therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prospective study of signalling pathways in myeloma bone disease with regard to activity of the disease, extent of skeletal involvement and correlation to bone turnover markers
- Date Crossref
- 21/12/2015
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.