Aller au contenu principal
2011 article

Living kidney donor transplants over a 16-year period in South Africa: A single center experience

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Afrique du Sud. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The number of patients on the waiting list is increasing due to an imbalance between organ supply and demand. This has led to an increase in the number of living donor transplants in most parts of the world. The benefits to the recipients must, however, be weighed against the risks to the donors. Long-term follow-up of the donors is therefore imperative to ascertain the risks of living kidney donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 571 potential living kidney donors (PLDs) in Johannesburg hospital over a 16-year period between 1990 and 2005. RESULTS: There were 1030 kidney transplants during this period, with 800 cadaveric and 230 actual living donor (ALD) transplants. There were 571 PLDs; however, 341 (59.7%) withdrew or were withdrawn because of medical and non-medical reasons. Among the 230 ALDs, the mean age of the donors was 35.2 ± 8.3 years; 55% were females; 24% were Blacks. Eighty-five percent were related to the recipients while 15% were unrelated. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.6 ± 6.4 years. The pattern of post-donation follow-up was excellent in 29.7%, adequate in 34% and unacceptable/poor in 36.3%, based on the number of clinic visits post-donation. Hypertension was noted in 24% of the donors during long-term follow-up. Three of the donors also developed significant microalbuminuria. CONCLUSION: There is a need to encourage living kidney donation, especially amongst the Black populations, and to emphasize the value and significance of post-donation follow-up visits to all potential donors.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Living kidney donor transplants over a 16-year period in South Africa: A single center experience
Date Crossref
01/01/2011
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of the Witwatersrand University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud (code pays fourni par la source)
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Johannesburg Hospital Johannesburg Hospital, Afrique du Sud (code pays fourni par la source)
    Établissement de santé
  • Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Internal Medicine University of Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud (pays nommé en fin d’affiliation)
    Université ou école supérieure

University of the Witwatersrand (University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud), Johannesburg Hospital (Johannesburg Hospital, Afrique du Sud) et Department of Internal Medicine — Faculty of Health Sciences (University of Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud). Pays d’affiliation : Afrique du Sud.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Organ Donation and TransplantationRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsCancer Research and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.