How to Increase the Diagnostic Value of Malignancy-Related Ascites: Discriminative Ability of the Ascitic Tumour Markers

Le résumé fourni par la source

Making a differential diagnosis between malignant and non-malignant ascites is an important clinical issue, but cytological examination has a relatively low diagnostic sensitivity. This study aimed to find a discriminative model that distinguished between malignancy-related and non-malignant ascites. The study included 107 patients: 50 with non-malignant and 57 with malignant ascites. Ascites was analysed using a range of tumour markers and standard cytology. Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients were used to distinguish between ascites types. The combination of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA-21.1) discriminated between malignancy-related ascites and non-malignant ascites with an accuracy of 98.8% compared with an accuracy of 77.8% for cytological examination. In conclusion, the use of a discriminant function constructed from a combination of CA15-3, CEA and CYFRA-21.1 could distinguish malignant from non-malignant ascites with greater accuracy than cytological examination. Further studies in larger population groups are warranted.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.